Court Cases

Plexus Worldwide LLC v. TruVision Health LLC

TruVision Health has been in the spotlight the past few months, alongside Plexus Worldwide (or whatever they call themselves these days)

Plexus Worldwide became not so worldwide in the past year, and their products have turned out to be junk. Most users do not have results with their products, and it is questionable if any of those that do have results, are linked directly to the products or instead to a change in diet and exercise and such.

Go here to read more on Plexus Worldwide.

TruVision Health has been rumored to be the bees knees of products and start up companies. This company has thousand of  unhappy Plexus peeps climbing on board after jumping ship from Plexus. Mostly due to the way Plexus has carried on their business, with shady business dealings, products that suck, false advertising, misleading information and the way in which they allow their top people to slander others and provide them with inside knowledge and secrets.

It's rumored that TruVision Health had a product that easily enticed those Plexus peeps, a product that was known by users and sellers of Plexus to "work". Plexus stopped distributing that product for resale due to alleged legal action. Stands to reason that anyone with a brain will purchase products that work.

Rumors and speculation over Dave Brown and his infamous Pink Drink run rampant.

I will confirm, that Dave Brown is still around. What is going on..that will be unraveled.

Visit this Blog to read more

What is the Court Case all about?


Plexus Worldwide LLC v. Gregory Spencer - Breast Cream

These parties settled out of court.


Texas Court Case Unsubstantiated Claims

In January 2003, a Texas District Court issued this injunction ordering Brian S. Peskin and his company to pay $100,000 to the State of Texas and to refrain from making a long list of unsubstantiated claims about their Radiant Health Products and Peskin's credentials.

""21. Distributing, selling, shipping, mailing, delivering, or sending any of Defendants' products (Basic Essence, Mineral Essence or Herbal Essence) to any person, entity, or business which Defendants know or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known, uses any of the following (or similar) express or implied. representations in any advertising by such person, entity or business (including the Internet) relating to Defendants' food products: that Defendants' products will (1) protect against heart disease; (2) reduce the risk of breast, prostate and other cancers; (3) eliminate varicose veins; (4) lower blood pressure; (5) lower cholesterol; (6) eliminate cellulite; (7) prevent diabetes; (8) manage ADD; (9) help children or other persons with ADD, ADHD, or hyperactivity; (10) be safe for infants, toddlers and pregnant or nursing mothers; (11) make children smarter; (12) cure constipation; and (13) any other express or implied health or disease claim which has not been substantiated by Defendants and approved by the FDA or which satisfies the requirements of § 403(r)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act;""

Clear disclosure of the customer’s obligation

B. Violating any of the provisions of Health and Safety Code §§ 110760, 110675, and/or 110770, which provisions relate to the manufacturing, selling, delivering, holding, advertising or offering for sale any NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENT that is misbranded or delivering any such NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENT that is misbranded; C. Enrolling any customer in any automatic shipment program Without first providing the customer with a clear disclosure of the customer’s obligation under the program, and obtaining the customer’s expressed clear and informed consent to enroll the customer in the program and assume the obligations of the program at the time the automatic shipment program is ordered by the customer. D. Violating Civil Code §1584.5, by offering for sale goods